pac
Industrial Liquid PAC: Price & Dose | Beta Pramesti Asia
Industrial liquid PAC for water and wastewater treatment: compare grade, active content, jar-tested dose, cost per m³, tanks, dosing, and supply term.
Industrial liquid PAC is a ready-to-dose coagulant for water and wastewater plants, but demand and price depend on grade, active content, jar-tested dose, volume, tank facilities, location, and delivery pattern. Compare cost per m³ of water meeting the target rather than product price per kilogram alone.
PT Beta Pramesti Asia, through beta.co.id, supplies liquid PAC and application support for industrial process water, raw water, and wastewater treatment in Indonesia. Buyers can compare liquid and solid PAC, ACH, or another coagulant on the same samples and treated-water targets.
Factors that determine liquid PAC pricing
| Factor | Cost effect |
|---|---|
| Grade, active content, and basicity | Establishes the quality and comparative-dose basis |
| Jar-tested dose | Converts price per kg into consumption and cost per m³ |
| Volume and delivery pattern | Defines packaging, supply frequency, and safety stock |
| Tank and dosing system | Affects transfer, dilution, materials, and calibration needs |
| Unloading location | Affects delivered cost and access requirements |
Which data belong in a liquid PAC quotation?
The name “liquid PAC” is not enough to compare two products. Each quotation should identify the grade and specification basis so dose, tank capacity, consumption, safety, and price can be assessed consistently.
| Quotation data | Why it matters | Evidence to request |
|---|---|---|
| Product duty and grade | Separates process-water, wastewater, and other intended uses | TDS and grade statement |
| Active content and basicity | Establishes a common comparison basis | Specification and batch CoA |
| Density and form | Converts mass feed into pump volumetric flow | TDS, CoA, and reference temperature |
| Product pH and compatibility | Affects tank, pipe, seal, and pump materials | SDS and wetted-material list |
| Packaging, volume, and lead time | Defines unloading, safety stock, and delivery frequency | Commercial offer and logistics plan |
| Tested dose | Converts price per kg into cost per treated m³ | Documented jar test and plant trial |
Do not use a generic specification range from the internet as the purchase basis. Active content, basicity, density, impurities, grade, storage, and shelf life should come from the exact product and batch being offered.
How should liquid PAC, solid PAC, and ACH be compared?
| Buyer question | Liquid PAC | Solid PAC | ACH | How to decide |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dosing readiness | Can reduce dissolution work | Requires controlled make-down | Depends on product form | Audit tanks, mixing, pumps, and operators |
| Logistics | Transports product with its water content | More concentrated for transport | Depends on grade and concentration | Calculate delivered cost and storage |
| Water response | Not universal | Not universal | Not universal | Jar test on the same sample, pH, and temperature |
| Alkalinity/pH effect | Depends on grade and dose | Depends on grade and dose | Often tested where buffering is limited | Measure before and after testing |
| Total cost | Product, handling, dosing, and sludge | Dissolution, labour, dust, and sludge | Product, dosing, and sludge | Compare cost/m³ at one water target |
Use the PAC water-treatment guide for jar-test method and the ACH water-treatment guide for a pre-hydrolysed comparison. Testing should assess turbidity or TSS, colour/organics where relevant, pH, alkalinity, floc size and strength, separation time, residuals, sludge volume, and filtrate quality.
For application evidence, read the 17% liquid PAC optimization case at a water treatment plant. It compares product dose, sedimentation turbidity, dissolution work, operator exposure, and monthly chemical cost under one documented operating condition.
How should liquid PAC demand and cost be calculated?
State dose consistently as commercial product:
Product demand (kg/h) = dose (mg/L) × flow (m³/h) ÷ 1,000
Chemical cost (currency/m³) = dose (mg/L) × delivered price per kg ÷ 1,000
Add alkali, flocculant, make-down labour, mixing energy, sludge treatment, delivery, and stock losses for a total-cost comparison. Calibrate the chemical dosing pump with actual product density and conditions rather than stroke position alone.
What should be checked when liquid PAC performance is unstable?
| Symptom | First checks | Evaluation response |
|---|---|---|
| Floc does not form | Actual dose, pH, alkalinity, mixing, and water change | Repeat a dose/pH sweep before raising dose |
| Floc breaks | Shear, injection order, dosing point, and flocculation time | Test mixing and injection location |
| Sludge rises sharply | Dose, influent solids, polymer, and sludge withdrawal | Compare sludge mass at the same water target |
| Pump loses capacity | Density, viscosity, valves, tubing, calibration, and level | Restore delivery before changing the programme |
| Filtrate quality declines | Coagulation, separation, filter loading, and backwash | Audit the clarifier or DAF with the chemistry |
Frequently asked buyer questions about liquid PAC
Does liquid PAC always dose lower than alum?
No. Response depends on product grade and water characteristics. Compare dose and total cost under the same test procedure; do not assume one form is always superior.
Which documents should arrive with the product?
Request the TDS, SDS, batch CoA, grade information, packaging, storage, shelf life, and handling instructions. These records support receiving, compatibility, and batch traceability.
Which data are needed for an evaluation?
Send the water source and flow, pH, alkalinity, turbidity/TSS, colour, COD/TOC where relevant, current coagulant/dose, water target, jar-test results, dosing facilities, monthly demand, location, and sludge route through the Beta contact page.